Marquette County Savings Bank v. Koivisto
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Marquette; Stone, J. Garnishment proceedings by the Marquette County Savings Bank against Matti Koivisto as garnishee of Adam Nangas. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by the garnishee on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This is an action of garnishment by which the garnishee defendant is sought to be held liable for the debt of the principal defendant to the plaintiff, under the terms of the so-called ‘ ‘ sales in bulk act ” (Act No. 228, Pub. Acts 1905), which provides that sales of stocks of merchandise, etc., otherwise than in the ordinary course of trade, etc., shall be void as against the creditors of the seller, unless the seller shall make at least five days before the sale a detailed inventory showing the cost price, etc., and the purchaser demands and receives of the seller a certified list, under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Musselman Grocer Co. v. Kidd, Dater & Price Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
- Spurr v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- United Firemen's Ins. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1897
- Davenport v. State Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Palmer v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. MontgomeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Sheffield Car Co. v. Constantine Hydraulic Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co. v. McIntosh & WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Meyer v. National Fire InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.