Musselman Grocer Co. v. Kidd, Dater & Price Co.

This case calls for a construction of the so-called “sales in bulk act,” Act No. 223 of the Public Acts of 1905. The act is assailed for eight different reasons, but all of them revolve about the following propositions which we quote from the brief:

“ First. That if Act No. 223 of the Public Acts of 1905 of this State is valid that garnishment proceedings do not lie for its enforcement.

“ Second. That the said act violates section 32 of article 6 of the Constitution of this State, which provides that no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.

‘ ‘ Third.…