Legal Opinion

Attorney General Ex Rel. O'Hara v. Montgomery

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1936No. Calendar 38,784PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

December 10, 1935, the attorney general, on the relation of Elmer B. O’Hara, filed an information in the nature of quo warranto in this court against Henry A. Montgomery to show by what authority he, the said Montgomery, claimed to hold the office of county clerk of Wayne county.

December 24, 1935, the defendant filed an answer showing that though Mr. O’Hara was. duly elected to the office of county clerk of Wayne county at the November, 1932, election and reelected to that office at the November, 1934, election, relator failed to give the official bonds required of him and that he was…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Ex Parte WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. MedleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Cancemi v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  5. MacKin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Taxpayers of Michigan Against Casinos v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. People Ex Rel. Keenan v. McGuaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Bell v. Treasurer of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API