Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Co. v. King
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action by D. King against the Williamson-Halsell-Frasier Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
Defendant in error as plaintiff commenced this action against plaintiff in' error to recover damages for the wrongful attachment and sale of certain-fixtures claimed by him. For convenience the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the trial court. Verdict was for plaintiff.
It appears from the evidence that one J. Y. Burke was indebted to defendant upon account, and on August 23, 1911, suit was commenced thereon, and upon August 24 a writ of attachment was levied upon certain fixtures in possession of said Burke and afterwards sold. The evidence of plaintiff tended to establish that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hart v. Farmers & Mechanics BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
- Cole v. . TylerNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Murphy v. . JackNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Scott v. Signal Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Ellet-Kendall Shoe Co. v. RossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Realty Co. v. Robertson'sSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Rosen v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.