Legal Opinion
Meyer v. National Fire Insurance
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 14, 1936No. File No. 6416PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBubb, J.
On July 30, 1932, the defendant, through one Rausch, insured property of the plaintiff against fire, as follows: the dwelling house, furniture, and furnishings for $800.00 and the outbuildings for $260.00, taking a note for the premium due October-1, 1932.
The contract for insurance provided:
That if this note “be not paid at maturity, this policy shall be suspended, inoperative, and of no force or effect so long as such note, or any part thereof, remains overdue and unpaid, and no legal action on the part of this company to enforce payment shall be construed as reviving the policy. And in case…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Queen Insurance v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Hoxie v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
- Joliffe v. Madison Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Smiley v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Steckler v. StecklerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Kessler v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
- Tormaschy v. TormaschyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Lumbermen's Mut. Ins. v. Slide Rule & Scale Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Richland County v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.