Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 1922No. L. A. No. 6605PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARDS, J., pro tem

This action was brought by the plaintiffs, the widow and minor child of George V. Lawrence, deceased, to recover damages for his death, which occurred on April 3, 1919, in El Centro, California, at the intersection of Orange Avenue with a spur-track of the Southern Pacific Company in that city. The defendants named in the action are the Southern Pacific Company and Walker D. Hines, Director-General of Railroads, and it is a conceded fact in the case that at the time of the accident which caused the death of the decedent the railroad and its equipment was being operated by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McKune v. Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Satterlee v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Steinberger v. California Electric Garage Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Vaughn v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Peacock v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hitson v. M. J. DwyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Hodge v. Weinstock, Lubin & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Flores v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Freeman v. NickersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API