Legal Opinion

Satterlee v. Bliss

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1869PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The testimony tended to show that in March, 1849, Jonathan D. Stevenson claimed a tract of land of about seventy-seven acres in San Francisco, west of any land then surveyed or occupied, and had the same surveyed, and put two small houses thereon, which he kept occupied by men; that in April, 1850, Stevenson took in with him in the claim Satterlee, the plaintiff, Howard, Hastings,…

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court, Fifteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The testimony tended to show that in March, 1849, Jonathan D. Stevenson claimed a tract of land of about seventy-seven acres in San Francisco, west of any land then surveyed or occupied, and had the same surveyed, and put two small houses thereon, which he kept occupied by men; that in April, 1850, Stevenson took in with him in the claim Satterlee, the plaintiff, Howard, Hastings, and Morse, and that Parsons afterwards took the place of Morse; that in May, 1850, the parties inclosed the land with a…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Sawyer, C. J. :

This is an action to recover land in San Francisco. Both parties rely on prior possession in themselves and their grantors, and on title claimed to have been derived under the Van Hess Ordinance.

There is nothing in appellants’ first point. The deed from Satterlee to Reese was certainly admissible, and the deed from Stevenson to Howard ivas referred to in that deed, and was only put in evidence as explanatory of it.

The defendants were strangers to the deed from Stevenson to Reese, and were not precluded from showing the purpose for which it was executed. (1 Greenl.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chirac v. ReinickerSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Davis v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Kisling v. ShawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Caperton v. SchmidtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Marshall v. ShafterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Baird v. KoernerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  3. Hays v. WoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People ex rel. Vogelstein v. Warden of the County JailNew York Supreme Court · 1934

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API