Steinberger v. California Electric Garage Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. E. P. Unangst, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
The plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought suit to recover for personal injuries to the wife, alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs for five thousand four hundred dollars. Prom the judgment and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals.
The undisputed facts are that on the evening of September 10,1910, one of the defendant’s employees was driving an electric automobile of defendant through the business district of Pasadena and towing a gas-car guided by another servant of defendant, one Knight. Both ears, displaying the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Merrill v. Los Angeles Gas Elec. Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Green v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Melone v. Sierra Ry. Co. of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Mahoney v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Starr v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. CrossanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Blanton v. CurryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- W. States Gas & Elec. Co. v. Bayside Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.