Legal Opinion
Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 28, 1925No. Docket No. 2896PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDANIEL, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff Ruth Jones, widow of B. B. Jones, deceased, and the mother of the plaintiffs Virginia Jones, Nannie Stevens and Mrs. Fletcher Stevens, prosecutes this action against the Southern Pacific Company, a corporation. Walter W. Webb and Charles P. Alexander, respectively, fireman and locomotive engineer on extra freight No. 2327, also are defendants, but were not served with summons, this action, therefore, being against the Southern Pacific Company alone, to recover damages for the death of said B. B. Jones, alleged to have been occasioned by the negligence of…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Aerkfetz v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Olsen v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Peri v. L.A. Junction Ry.California Supreme Court · 1943
- Southern Pac. Co. v. HaightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Switzler v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Bush v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.