Briggs v. Hall
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought on an assigned claim for a broker’s commission in the sale of real estate. Attached to the complaint is the contract of agency executed by the owner of the property from which we quote as follows: “In consideration of their efforts to sell the within described property, I hereby appoint Lyman & Briggs of Sebastopol, California, to act as agents for the sale of said property for the sum of thirteen thousand dollars, and I agree not to offer the same for a less price before the expiration of this contract without the consent of said agents. I agree that in case of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Newman v. Overland Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
- Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Miller v. CarlisleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Derby v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
- Fix v. SissungMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jordan v. HilbertSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
- Hill v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Pryor v. McGuireCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- De La Questa v. Armstrong Holdings Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Daniel v. CalkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.