De La Questa v. Armstrong Holdings Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from the judgment entered upon an order sustaining a general demurrer to the amended complaint, without leave to amend, plaintiff conceding that no amendment could be made.
It is alleged in the amended complaint that the defendant, a corporation,' was the owner of a thirty-two hundred acre ranch in the county of Santa Barbara, together with the improvements, stock, and necessary equipment. Being de sirous of securing the services of plaintiff to negotiate an exchange or sale of said property with a party known to plaintiff, but unknown to defendant, it employed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jauman v. McCusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Brown v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ropes v. John Rosenfeld's SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Scott v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Union Oil Co. v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Body-Steffner Co. v. Flotill Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Coleman v. MoraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Wilson v. RoppoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Gates v. Carbon Hill Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1923
- Moor v. MagouirkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930