Legal Opinion
Pryor v. McGuire
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 1922No. Civ. No. 2463PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff brought the action to recover a commission as broker for the sale of defendant’s land. The case was tried by the court without a jury, and plaintiff had judgment, from which defendant appeals.
The trial court found that “on or about the 3rd day of March, 1921, the Defendant by the written agreement hereinafter referred to, employed the Plaintiff to find a purchaser for, and to sell for the Defendant, certain real property, described as follows: Ten acres of land adjoining the ‘Chisholm Ranch’ near Windsor in Sonoma County, California, which said real property…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Balfour & Garrette v. WorleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
- Dolan v. ScanlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Roth v. ThomsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Marks v. Walter G. McCarty Corp.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Chamberlain v. AbelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Walter v. LibbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.