Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Calkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 26, 1916No. Civ. No. 1711PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. A. Beasly, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment and order denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial.

The action was brought to recover the sum of $550 alleged to be due as the commission of a real estate agent in securing a purchaser for the property of the defendant, Sadie B. Calkins, pursuant to a written contract of authorization and also an alleged oral agreement as to the amount of commission to be received in the event of a sale. The evidence in the case discloses that the plaintiff was a real estate agent residing and doing business as such at Sunnyvale, in the county of Santa Clara, in the year…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toomy v. DunphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Kennedy v. MerickelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Naylor v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Briggs v. HallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Baird v. LoescherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. GaugerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Caminetti v. National Guaranty Life Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Bradner v. VasquezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. De La Questa v. Armstrong Holdings Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API