Legal Opinion

Fox v. Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2005No. S121173PublishedCited by 446 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MORENO, J.

Plaintiff Brandi R. Fox filed a medical malpractice action after gastric bypass surgery performed on her resulted in severe complications. In the course of discovery, Fox received information that a medical device used during the surgery may have malfunctioned, causing her injury. Fox then amended her complaint to add a products liability cause of action against the manufacturer of the device, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. (Ethicon). Ethicon filed a demurrer raising a statute of limitations defense, to which plaintiff responded by relying upon the delayed discovery rule most…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by446 opinions

  1. Aryeh v. Canon Business Solutions, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Shirk v. Vista Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Miklosy v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Platt Electrical Supply, Inc. v. Eoff Electrical, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Pineda v. Bank of America, N.A.California Supreme Court · 2010

441 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API