Legal Opinion
Gilmore v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1937No. Civ. 5912PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is a petition for a writ of mandamus to require the refunding of that portion of an annual premium paid by the Templar Mining Company to the State Compensation Insurance Fund of California, which was not expended during the life of the insurance policy in payment of compensation for injuries and disabilities sustained by the employees of the insured company. Separate demurrers were filed by the respondents on the ground that the petition fails to state facts sufficient to warrant the issuance of the writ. A verified answer to the writ was also filed by the respondents.
Incident…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Rauschan v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Commercial Cas. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.California Supreme Court · 1930
- People v. Yosemite Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
- People v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance FundIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Burum v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- State Ex Rel. Williams v. MusgraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1962
- P. W. Stephens, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- De Campos v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.