Legal Opinion

Rauschan v. State Compensation Insurance Fund

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 22, 1927No. Docket No. 3187PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action in tort and was brought by the plaintiff to recover damages upon two separate and distinct causes of action—the one, for the utterance by the defendant Gilbert, “as the servant and agent of the (defendant) State Compensation Insurance Fund,” of certain alleged slanderous language and words of and concerning plaintiff, and involving the statement that plaintiff was afflicted with a loathsome disease, and the second founded upon the charge that, by reason of said alleged slanderous language and words, as so uttered by said Gilbert, they having been uttered in the presence of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  2. Western Indemnity Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Gibbons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  4. Carr v. State ex rel. CoetlosquetIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. People v. . StephensNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State v. BrannanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  3. Holzworth v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State Ex Rel. State Insurance Fund v. BoneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  5. Security Officers Service, Inc. v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API