Legal Opinion

Commercial Cas. Ins. Co. v. Indus. Acc. Com.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1930No. Docket No. S.F. 13943PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This proceeding was instituted for the purpose of annulling an award of the Industrial Accident Commission against the petitioner, requiring it to pay to the treasurer of the state of California, for the benefit of the "subsequent injuries fund" the sum of $300. The proceeding was instituted and the award made under an amendment by the legislature of 1929 to the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act of 1917 (Stats. 1929, p. 420), which for the sake of brevity will be hereinafter referred to as the Workmen's Compensation Act. The amendment so far as it applies to the questions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yosemite Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Gilmore v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Travelers Insurance v. Sierra Pacific AirlinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API