Legal Opinion
De Campos v. State Compensation Insurance Fund
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1946No. Civ. 7206PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, P. J.
This is an appeal by defendant from an order denying its motion for a change of venue from Placer County to the city and county of San Francisco. Plaintiffs’ complaint alleges as follows: Plaintiffs are engaged in mining in Placer County. Defendant is “a political subdivision of the State of California” carrying on a workmen’s compensation insurance business, insuring employers against liability under the Workmen’s Compensation and Safety Act. About December 26, 1940, defendant issued to plaintiffs a workmen’s compensation insurance policy, copy of which is made a part of the complaint. On or…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Armstrong v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Kaluzok v. BrissonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Barber v. GallowayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Hale v. BohannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Regents of University of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Dawson v. GoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Pacific Bal Industries v. Northern Timber, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.