Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance Fund
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TROUT, Chief Justice.
Kelso & Irwin, P.A. (now known as Starr Kelso Law Office, Chartered (Kelso)) appeals from the district judge’s dismissal of its complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to I.R.C.P. 12(b)(6). Kelso argues the judge erred in dismissing the case because Kelso has a vested contract or property interest in the monies and assets of the State Insurance Fund (SIF).
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Kelso is a professional corporation that has obtained worker’s compensation insurance fi’om SIF since 1993. One of Kelso’s former employees…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- Orthman v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
- Methodist Hospital v. State Insurance FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Moran v. State Ex Rel. DerryberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- State v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Dyet v. McKinleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Quail Hill, LLC v. County of RichlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.