Legal Opinion

Kelso & Irwin, P.A. v. State Insurance Fund

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2000No. 24814PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

Kelso & Irwin, P.A. (now known as Starr Kelso Law Office, Chartered (Kelso)) appeals from the district judge’s dismissal of its complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to I.R.C.P. 12(b)(6). Kelso argues the judge erred in dismissing the case because Kelso has a vested contract or property interest in the monies and assets of the State Insurance Fund (SIF).

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Kelso is a professional corporation that has obtained worker’s compensation insurance fi’om SIF since 1993. One of Kelso’s former employees…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Miles v. Idaho Power Co. Ex Rel. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Orthman v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Methodist Hospital v. State Insurance FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Moran v. State Ex Rel. DerryberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. State v. PayneIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Waddoups v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Dyet v. McKinleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Quail Hill, LLC v. County of RichlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. St. Luke's Regional Medical Center, Ltd. v. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API