Legal Opinion
Curtis v. Hannaford & Talbot
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 1965No. Civ. 21997PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
Respondent, Curtis, obtained judgment against Hannaford & Talbot, a corporation, stock brokers, on an asserted warranty that shares of a certain stock would produce 100 per cent profit over a period of 12 months; and the brokerage firm appeals.
Respondent had bought and sold securities through appellant and had dealt with appellant’s salesman, Turner, at its Ukiah office. In the transaction which led to this action, it was claimed by respondent that he ordered the purchase of 200 shares of American Marietta and 100 shares of A B C Vending Company, and that he asked Turner to check on “what is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hill v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Barclay Kitchen, Inc. v. California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Tidewater Southern Railway Co. v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Cignetti v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Ghiglione v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Hartong v. Partake, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Asplund v. Selected Invs. in Fin. Equities, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
- Doyle v. Surety Title & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Kahn v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967