Hill v. Citizens National Trust & Savings Bank of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
By this action against the respondent bank, the appellants seek to recover under a contract by which another corporation agreed to sell certain real estate upon the ground that the corporation was the agent of the bank. At the time the contract was made the bank held title to a large parcel of property of which the land described in the contract was a part. The whole parcel was subject to a deed of trust which was later foreclosed. Thereafter the appellants gave notice to the bank that they had rescinded the agreement and this action followed.
In 1928 Harold G. Ferguson corporation was the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Weintraub v. WeingartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Salfield v. Sutter County Land Improvement & Reclamation Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by36 opinions
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Quintal v. Laurel Grove HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Grewe v. Mount Clemens General HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Berríos Pagán v. Universidad de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1985
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.