Legal Opinion

Cignetti v. American Trust Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1956No. Civ. 16690PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVINE, J. pro tem.*

We are faced with the necessity again of deciding which of two innocent parties must bear the loss caused by the perfidy of Gladys McCormick, as we had to do in the ease of Hagen v. Silva, ante, p. 199 [293 P.2d 143]. In that case, we were engaged with the subject of authority to collect principal as related to admitted authority to collect interest. In this case, authority of the agent to collect both principal and interest is not in dispute, but the question is whether or not the agent had authority to endorse commercial paper made payable to the principal.

Plaintiff, a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ernst v. SearleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Harris v. San Diego Flume Co.California Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Walsh v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. County First National Bank v. Coast Dairies & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Gaine v. AustinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Navrides v. Zurich InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Palomo v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. R. Milo Gilbert v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Firato v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Doria v. International Union, Allied Industrial Workers of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API