Tidewater Southern Railway Co. v. Harney
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
On July 25, 1911, respondent subscribed in writing for five hundred shares of the common stock of the Tidewater and Southern Railroad Company, for which she agreed to pay five hundred dollars. At that time the railroad company was actively engaged in soliciting subscriptions for stock. The subscriptions were made out in triplicate. One marked “original” was retained by the company, one marked “duplicate” was given to the subscriber, and the other marked “triplicate” was retained by the agent. At the time of this subscription defendant executed her note for five hundred dollars for said stock.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Field v. AustinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Otis Elevator Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Lynch v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Jordan v. GroverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Anderson v. ThacherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Pasadena Medi-Center Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Federal Land Bank v. Union Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Laraway v. First National Bank of La VerneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Kaplan v. Reid Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.