Legal Opinion

Valentine v. Streeton

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1908No. Civ. No. 583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. W. P. James, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant and from an order denying a new trial in an action to quiet title.

The record discloses that in April, 1904, Herbert Valentine, then owning certain premises described in the pleadings, executed to one Hyde a lease of said premises for a term, of ten years at the annual rental of $180, in addition to which the lessee was to pay all taxes assessed against said premises during the life of the lease, together with certain insurance premiums; it being stipulated in the lease that upon default in payment of rent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Windsor v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Burlingame v. RowlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crane v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Hedden v. WaldeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Archer v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Laguna Land & Water Co. v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Cuthbert Burrel Co. v. ShirleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API