Legal Opinion

Cuthbert Burrel Co. v. Shirley

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1944No. Civ. 3114PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment quieting plaintiff’s title to about 12,000 acres of land in Fresno County. The sole question presented by appellant, on which he bases his argument for a reversal of the judgment, is that the descriptions of the property contained in the complaint and judgment are too vague and uncertain to describe any property so that the complaint fails to state a cause of action and the judgment fails to describe any property that can be identified.

Were this the ordinary case of an action to quiet title we would be compelled to sustain the argument under the rule laid…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Joyce v. TomasiniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Gray v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Sheehan v. VedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Aalwyn's Law Institute v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. E. E. McCalla Co. v. SleeperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  2. Alkus v. Johnson-Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Michal v. AdairCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Childers v. ChildersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API