Legal Opinion

Windsor v. Miner

California Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1899No. S. F. No. 1238PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Monterey County denying a new trial. N. A. Dorn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

The defendants appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The action was to enforce specific performance of an option to purchase, given in a lease from defendants to plaintiff, of a certain 85.45 acres of land.

The complaint alleges-that on July 6, 1891, plaintiff owned a certain three hundred and ninety acres of land in Monterey county; that defendants had a mortgage on said land to secure an indebtedness of plaintiff to them of twenty thousand eight hundred and ninety-eight dollars and seventy-one cents; that on *493said date plaintiff executed to defendants a deed of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Morrill v. EversonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. De Arguello v. BoursCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Nicholson v. TarpeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. De Graff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Prince v. LambCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  3. White v. SageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Stiles v. CainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Fleishman v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API