Legal Opinion

Crane v. Roach

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 7, 1916No. Civ. No. 1734PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. J. D. Murphey, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtKerrigan, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment against them and from an order denying their motion for new trial,

A general statement of the facts of the case is as follows: In the month of July, 1908, the Berkeley Development Company was the owner of the land described in the complaint subject to a written contract to convéy to the defendant Elizabeth D. Roach upon payment of the sum of $1,750, this sum being payable in installments. In the month of July, 1911, the defendant named had paid on account of this sum $1,088.83, leaving a balance of $661.17 unpaid. The lot of land, it seems, had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Windsor v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Jolliffe v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  4. Valentine v. StreetonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Long Beach Drug Co. v. United Drug Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Sheehan v. VedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Moklofsky v. MoklofskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API