Legal Opinion
Hedden v. Waldeck
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1928No. Docket No. 6130PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKoford, P. J.
JThe plaintiffs, husband and wife, brought this action for possession. It was labeled an action for forcible entry and detainer, but is referred to in the briefs as ejectment. It was tried by stipulation at the same time and upon the same evidence as case No. 6129, Waldeck v. Hedden et al., ante, p. 485 [265 Pac. 340], a specific performance case between the same parties. Separate findings and judgment for the defendant were made and entered.
No separate briefs are filed for this case. It is submitted upon the briefs in case No. 6129, supra. The briefs in that case make scant reference to this…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bruck v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Garvey v. LashellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Blum v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Jolliffe v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Waldeck v. HeddenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sheehan v. VedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hedden v. WaldeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Pimentel v. the Hall-Baker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Schuman v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Baker Divide Mining Co. v. MaxfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.