Archer v. Miller
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
—These are two appeals in the same action. Plaintiff brought the action to quiet title to forty acres of land owned by him. By his answer the defendant admitted that the plaintiff is the owner and in possession of the land, but alleged that the same is subject to contract rights of the defendant. These rights are claimed under a contract dated September 10, 1921, whereby Archer, as party of the first part, leased said real property to Miller for the term of ten years, commencing November 1, 1921, at a total rent' of $40,000, payable as follows: $4,000 on or before four' years from November 1,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Stanton v. SingletonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Los Angeles & Bakersfield Oil & Development Co. v. Occidental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Pacific Etc. Ry. Co. v. Campbell-JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Salisbury v. YawgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Sheehan v. VedderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Pimentel v. the Hall-Baker Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Williams v. RushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Hedden v. WaldeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.