Legal Opinion
Seybert v. County of Imperial
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 17, 1958No. Civ. 5839PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, Acting P. J.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries in which the trial court sustained a demurrer as to the defendant Imperial County on the ground that the first amended complaint did not state facts sufficient to state a cause of action against said county. The demurrer was sustained with leave to amend. However, the plaintiffs failed to amend their complaint within the time allowed by the court and thereafter, on motion of the defendant county, a judgment of dismissal as to it was entered. Plaintiffs appeal from this judgment, contending that the allegations of their amended complaint are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Irvin v. PadelfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Campbell v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Stang v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Hayes v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- American Can Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Holmes v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Quelvog v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.