Legal Opinion
Irvin v. Padelford
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 17, 1954No. Civ. 19995; Civ. 19941PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Plaintiff Irvin filed two actions, one against Arthur James Padelford, and the other against the city of Pomona, to recover damages for injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The cases were consolidated for trial before a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $20,000 against both defendants. Each of the defendants appeals from the judgment.
Facts: † On October 12, 1949, Second Street and Park Avenue were intersecting streets, each approximately 48 feet wide, in the city of Pomona. Park Avenue runs in a northerly and southerly direction and Second…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Kennedy v. IsenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Hook v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Lyle v. FioritoWashington Supreme Court · 1936
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Mickle v. BlackmonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
- Wagshal v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- O'HARE v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1960
- Teall v. City of CudahyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Callahan v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.