Legal Opinion

Campbell v. City of Santa Monica

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1942No. Civ. 13227PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, J. pro tem.

The question for decision is whether the defendant city is liable for injuries sustained by plaintiff John M. Campbell, a minor, as a result of being struck by a privately owned automobile driven by a member of the public along a wide sidewalk known as the “Promenade. ’ ’

The Promenade, or sidewalk,' located in the city of Santa Monica, runs parallel to the Pacific Ocean and immediately adjacent to its beach for a distance of approximately two miles. The Promenade is of concrete and is twenty feet in width. As indicated, it is a promenade or walk for the use of pedestrians,…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Peterson v. San Francisco Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Austin v. SchmedesTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Hayes v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Susman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Irvin v. PadelfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API