Peterson v. San Francisco Community College District
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROUSSARD, J.
This case presents the question whether a community college district and its agents have a duty to exercise due care to protect students from reasonably foreseeable assaults on the campus. We conclude that the district does owe such a duty to its students. As we shall explain, we also conclude that while the district is immune from liability for failure to provide adequate police protection, it is not immune for failure to warn its students of known dangers posed by criminals on the campus.
Plaintiff Kathleen Peterson brought this action for damages under California’s Tort…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by160 opinions
- Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Zelig v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Isaacs v. Huntington Memorial HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Elba A.B.M. v. Universidad de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1990
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.