Stang v. City of Mill Valley
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages suffered as the result of a fire on their property, claiming liability against the city and its officials by reason of their failure to maintain certain fire-fighting equipment in condition for effective use in extinguishing said fire. (Public Liability Act, Stats. 1923, ch. 328, § 2, p. 675; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act 5619; now found in Gov. Code, § 53051.) Defendants filed a general and special demurrer to the amended complaint. The demurrer was sustained with leave to amend. Plaintiffs declined to plead further and judgment accordingly was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Steitz v. City of BeaconNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
- Bauman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Fackrell v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Miller v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Hoel v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Stuart v. Crestview Mutual Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Vater v. County of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Bady v. DetwilerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Heieck and Moran v. City of ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.