Legal Opinion
People v. Bradley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 1992No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Prior to trial, defendant was offered a plea bargain contingent on his codefendant’s acceptance of a similar offer. When the codefendant rejected his offer, he and defendant proceeded to trial. Whether a defendant should be offered a plea rests in the discretion of the prosecutor, and there was nothing improper about the offer made in this case (see, People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400, 411-412, cert denied 449 US 1087; People v Brown, 144 AD2d 975, 976, lv denied 73 NY2d 889; see also, People v Esajerre, 35 NY2d 463, 466). The mere fact that defendant was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. EsajerreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. DiazAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. VassarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. TascarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. StephensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.