People v. Rogers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that a photo array shown to a prosecution witness was unduly suggestive and that County Court should therefore have suppressed an in-court identification of him by that witness. The array contained photos of six men with similar features, skin tone and hair styles. Although defendant is the only person in the array looking to his left, the viewer’s attention is not drawn to defendant’s photo in such a way as to indicate that the police were urging a particular selection (see, People v Brown, 169 AD2d 934, 935,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. LaneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. KnightNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. EmmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. WillisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. MaddoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. BankstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. KirklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.