Legal Opinion
People v. Lane
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject the contention that defendant was coerced into rejecting the plea offer by Supreme Court’s mistaken calculation of the maximum sentence he could receive after trial (see, People v Bradley, 184 AD2d 1041, Iv denied 80 NY2d 927). The contention that the court failed to provide "meaningful notice” of the jury’s requests for further information and instruction (see, CPL 310.30) has not been preserved for our review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v DeRosario, 81 NY2d 801, 803;…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. DeRosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. FinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. OyagueAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. BurgosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. LaneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- BURGOS, RUBEN JOSE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- LANE, JOHNNIE, PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.