People v. Stephens
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to the contention of defendant that County Court erred in denying his motion for new counsel without making further inquiry regarding the reasons for the motion (see, People v Rancka, 193 AD2d 1123, 1124, lv denied 82 NY2d 725; People v Kirkland, 177 AD2d 946, 946-947, lv denied 79 NY2d 859; see generally, People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822, 824).
*855The court properly denied discovery of documents and notes that formed the basis of the laboratory report concluding that the substance sold by defendant to the undercover officer was cocaine.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. SidesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. ChristopherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. HoppeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- People v. QuezadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. JurjensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. TascarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. FullardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Stephens v. CostelloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1999
- People v. PittsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.