Legal Opinion

People v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We find no Payton violation (see, Payton v New York, 445 US 573), as suggested by defendant, since there has been no showing that the police made a nonconsensual entry into defendant’s home to effect his arrest (People v Clinkscales, 134 AD2d 889, lv denied 70 NY2d 1005). The record discloses that the police officer approached defendant’s *976home, knocked on the door, and arrested defendant when he voluntarily opened the door. There is no indication that police used any force to enter the premises, that the officer in any way threatened defendant or…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. PenaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. EsajerreNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. People v. MinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. ClinkscalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. MoralesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. People v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. People v. CarmenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. The People v. Sean GarvinNew York Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API