Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Margulis
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.
This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to strike a cross-complaint.
Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company commenced the present action by filing a complaint alleging in substance that the defendants, J. Margulis and Jack Stollman, having theretofore subdivided a tract of land and prepared a map thereof containing a certificate of dedication to public use of streets, avenues and alleys shown on said map, entered into a written agreement with the- county of Los Angeles whereby, in consideration of the acceptance by the county for public use of the streets, avenues and alleys so…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Meyer v. QuiggleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Lewis v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sturges v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Dobbins v. HorsfallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Schwartz v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Bracey v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Linder v. Russian Health BathsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.