Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. Margulis

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 3, 1940No. Civ. 11889PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a motion to strike a cross-complaint.

Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company commenced the present action by filing a complaint alleging in substance that the defendants, J. Margulis and Jack Stollman, having theretofore subdivided a tract of land and prepared a map thereof containing a certificate of dedication to public use of streets, avenues and alleys shown on said map, entered into a written agreement with the- county of Los Angeles whereby, in consideration of the acceptance by the county for public use of the streets, avenues and alleys so…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Winter v. McMillanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Boskowitz v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Meyer v. QuiggleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Lewis v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sturges v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Dobbins v. HorsfallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Schwartz v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Bracey v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Linder v. Russian Health BathsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API