Legal Opinion

Bracey v. Gray

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1944No. Civ. 7027PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEEK, J.—

Prior to her marriage to defendant John Gray, the defendant Dora Stuart Gray purchased certain real property located near the city of Chico, which property was then subject to a note and deed of trust. Sometime after her marriage to John Gray a joint declaration of homestead was filed covering said real property. Default was made in payment of the obligation and the property was foreclosed. The plaintiffs herein subsequently acquired the property from the purchaser at the foreclosure sale. At the time of such acquisition by the plaintiffs the defendants still occupied the premises,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Meyer v. QuiggleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Gray v. BybeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Lowe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Clark v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Clark v. LesherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Nomellini Construction Co. v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  3. Bewley v. RiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Dale Ross v. Great Northern Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  5. Jones v. Russ Davis FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API