Legal Opinion

Linder v. Russian Health Baths

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1955No. Civ. 16140PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued the Baths and four individuals for damages for injuries. The Russian Health Baths cross-complained against Lloyds seeking recovery on policies of insurance covering the operation of the baths. The demand was for the full sum claimed by plaintiff as damages, together with costs of defending the action and attorney’s fees. Lloyds’ demurrer to the cross-complaint was sustained without leave to amend upon the consent of these cross-complainants. The appeal from this judgment is clearly frivolous.

A party may not appeal from a judgment entered with his consent. (Adams v. Southern…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Adams v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Metropolitan Casualty Insurance v. MargulisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Cushman v. CushmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. Wilson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Argonaut Insurance Exchange v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Williams v. Sacramento River Cats Baseball Club, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API