Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Quiggle

California Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1903No. L.A. No. 1115PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The plaintiff filed his complaint, alleging that he is the owner of a certain tract of land; that the defendant claims an interest therein adverse to him which is without right, and praying that the defendant be required to .set forth the nature of his claim; that all adverse claims be ■determined; that plaintiff be adjudged the owner of the land; and that defendant be debarred from asserting any •claim thereto. The defendant filed an answer and cross-complaint, in each of which he alleged certain facts upon which he claimed damages for a breach of contract, and that the same was a lien upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Fire Insurance Company v. . McKayNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Drinkhouse v. Van NessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Earl v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hanes v. CoffeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Thomson v. ThomsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API