Randolph Rand Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
DoNXON, Judge:
The merchandise of this litigation is conceded to consist of metal frames that were imported in 1957 and 1958, which were used in the manufacture of leather cases, or .boxes. The frames were charged with duty as parts of smokers’ articles, not specially provided for, at 80 percent under paragraph 1552.
Plaintiffs in their protest claim, alternatively, that these frames are properly dutiable as articles or wares, not specially provided for, composed wholly or in chief value of metal, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, at 20 percent under…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
- Kahlen v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Speiden v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1945
- Randolph Rand Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Stekert v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
3Cited by6 opinions
- W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Beacon Cycle & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1978
- Sumitomo Shoji New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Arden Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Continental Arms Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.