W. R. Filbin & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
NewmaN, Judge:
The issue to be decided in these two consolidated protests is the proper tariff classification of so-called “Crosby-Clip Bases.” It appears that a “Crosby-Clip” is a wire rope clip, which is used to hold together two pieces or two ends of wire rope. The imported articles, after completion in the United States, become a component part of such wire rope clips, viz., bases.
The merchandise (bases) was classified by the customs officials under the provision in item 657.20 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) for other articles of iron or steel, not coated or plated…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pitney-Bowes, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- F. L. Smidth & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Hollywood Accessories, Division of Allen Electronics & Equip. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- J. E. Bernard & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
- Winter-Wolff, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Cummins Engine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.