Legal Opinion

Randolph Rand Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 19, 1960No. C.D. 2211PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Donlon, Judge:

These protests, consolidated for trial, are limited to that part of the imported merchandise which consists of metal frames in chief value of brass, identified on the entry invoices more particularly as frame Ros. 8972, 3988, and 4122. The frames are the product of West Germany and were further described in one or more of the invoices as “frames for Leather Cig. Cases.”

The collector classified these frames under paragraph 1552 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 51802, as “smokers’ articles * * * and parts thereof, finished…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Klipstein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. Charles A. Redden, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lodge Spark Plug Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Randolph Rand Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Randolph Rand Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API