Legal Opinion

Stekert v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 16, 1954No. 58386; protest 204252-K (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This case relates to- merchandise described on the invoices as “action back cuff links of brass (85% copper),” which the collector assessed with duty at the rate of 55 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1527 (a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51802, as parts of jewelry, valued above 20 cents per dozen pieces. Plaintiffs make two claims. First, it is alleged that the merchandise is dutiable at the rate of 22}i per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51802, as articles or wares, not specially provided…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. American Bead Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  3. United States v. Lorsch & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  4. Waterbury Lock & Specialty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Randolph Rand Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API