Legal Opinion
Hapco Farms, Inc. v. Idaho Potato Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided February 2, 2001No. 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiff Hapco Farms, Inc. (“Hapco”), appeals from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Charles L. Brieant, Judge, dismissing its complaint against defendant Idaho Potato Commission (“IPC”) seeking a declaration pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1064 that certain federally registered certification marks and trademarks owned by IPC should be canceled, as well as damages based on IPC’s alleged use of those marks to violate federal antitrust laws. The district court dismissed the complaint on the ground that IPC is an agency of the State of Idaho,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mancuso v. New York State Thruway AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farms & SalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
3Cited by5 opinions
- The State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc., the State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & SalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & SalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Walker v. City of WaterburyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- State v. G&T Terminal Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005