Legal Opinion
Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 11, 2003No. Docket No. 02-7792(L), 02-7818(XAP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Idaho Potato Commission (“IPC”) appeals from a May 2002 Memorandum and Order (“May 2002 Order”) of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, J.), vacating a $41,962 jury award for the IPC in its certification mark1 infringement suit under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq., against M & M Produce Farm and Sales, M & M Packaging, Inc., and Matthew and Mark Rogowski individually (collectively “M & M”). The district court held that under the circumstances of this case there was no basis for monetary damages absent a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Flex-Foot, Inc. And Van L. Phillips v. Crp, Inc. (Doing Business as Springlite)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Warner-Jenkinson Company, and H. Kohnstamm & Company, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Allied Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- The Schlegel Manufacturing Company v. Usm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc., the State of Idaho Potato Commission v. G & T Terminal Packaging, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Can'T Stop Prods., Inc. v. Sixuvus, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- CBC DISTRIBUTION v. Major League BaseballDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2006
- Norwood Promotional Products, LLC v. Kustomkoozies, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & SalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003