Legal Opinion
Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 11, 2003No. 02-7792PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
335 F.3d 130
IDAHO POTATO COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee,
v.
M & M PRODUCE FARM & SALES, doing business as M & M Produce, M & M Packaging, Inc., Matthew Rogowski and Mark Rogowski, Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees-Cross-Appellants.
Docket No. 02-7792(L).
Docket No. 02-7818(XAP).
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued: March 18, 2003.
Decided: July 11, 2003.
David Zaslowsky, Baker & McKenzie, New York, N.Y., for Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee.
J. Joseph Bainton, Bainton McCarthy LLC, New York, NY (Irene M. Hurtado, on the brief), for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Flex-Foot, Inc. And Van L. Phillips v. Crp, Inc. (Doing Business as Springlite)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Beer Nuts, Inc. v. King Nut CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Warner-Jenkinson Company, and H. Kohnstamm & Company, Inc., Plaintiffs v. Allied Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- The Schlegel Manufacturing Company v. Usm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales, Dba M & M ProduceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Tea Board of India v. The Republic of Tea, Inc., Trademark Trial and Appeal Board2006